101

Douglas R. Hofstadter, Methamagical Themas. Questing for the Essence of Mind and Pattern. An Interlocked Collection of Literary, Scientific, and Artistic Studies (1985). (N. del A.)

102

Ibid. Comenta Donald Knuth's Article. (N. del A.)

103

Ibid. 272. (N. del A.)

104

Ibid. 264. Alude al libro de Scott Kim Inversions «in which a single written specimen or 'gram', has more than one reading, depending on the observer's point of view». (N. del A.)

105

Ibid. 279. (N. del A.)

106

Ibid. 264. (N. del A.)

107

Ibid. 261. (N. del A.)

108

Ch. S. Peirce, Writings of Ch. S. Peirce, vol. I (1982), 503. «In many respects, this trinity agrees with the Christian trinity: indeed I am not aware that there are many points of disagreement. The interpretant is evidently the Divine Logos of word; and if our former guess that a Reference to an interpretant is Paternity be right, this would be also the Son of God. The ground, being that partaking of which is requisite to any communication with the Symbol, corresponde in its function to the Holy Spirit». (N. del A.)

109

En hebreo, tierra es Adama, rojo es Adom y sangre es Dam. (N. del A.)

110

J. Laforgue, Les complaintes. «Complainte du pauvre-chevalier errant» (1880). (N. del A.)